CAFC Opinions/Orders

August 31, 2022

Appeal No.	Origin	Case Name	Status
22-1968	CFC	SMITH v. US [ORDER]	Nonprecedential
20-1903	ITC	INVT SPE LLC v. ITC [OPINION]	Precedential

August 30, 2022

Appeal No.	Origin	Case Name	Status
21-1489	CIT	YC RUBBER CO. (NORTH AMERICA) v. US [ERRATA]	Nonprecedential
21-2352	PTO	SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. v. DYNAMICS INC. [ERRATA]	Nonprecedential
20-1020	CFC	BISHAY v. US [OPINION]	Nonprecedential
21-2034	CFC	OLSEN v. US [ORDER]	Nonprecedential

August 29, 2022

Appeal No.	Origin	Case Name	Status
22-1134	CFC	MCLARNON v. US [ORDER]	Nonprecedential
21-1489	CIT	YC RUBBER CO. (NORTH AMERICA) v. US [OPINION]	Precedential
22-1962	BCA	PATEL v. WHITE HOUSE CHIEF OF STAFF [ORDER]	Nonprecedential
22-1736	MSPB	ORAM v. MSPB [ORDER]	Nonprecedential
21-2099	PTO	BEST MEDICAL INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. ELEKTA INC. [OPINION]	Precedential
21-2077	CAVC	CARTER v. MCDONOUGH [OPINION]	Precedential

August 26, 2022

Appeal No.	Origin	Case Name	Status
22-1543	CFC	MOHAMMED v. US [ORDER]	Nonprecedential
22-1768	DCT	O’DONNELL v. AVIS RENT A CAR SYSTEM, LLC [ORDER]	Nonprecedential
21-2084	PTO	BEST MEDICAL INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. ELEKTA INC. [RULE 36 JUDGMENT]	Nonprecedential
21-2099	PTO	BEST MEDICAL INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. ELEKTA INC. [OPINION]	Precedential
22-1502	CIT	BORUSAN MANNESMANN BORU SANAYI VE TICARET A.S. v. US [ORDER]	Nonprecedential

August 25, 2022

Appeal No.	Origin	Case Name	Status
22-1347	MSPB	AHMED v. MSPB [ORDER]	Nonprecedential
22-2111	ITC	ADT LLC v. ITC [ORDER]	Nonprecedential

August 23, 2022

Appeal No.	Origin	Case Name	Status
21-2113	PTO	In Re KILLIAN [OPINION]	Precedential

August 22, 2022

Appeal No.	Origin	Case Name	Status
22-1096	CFC	HAWKINS v. US [OPINION]	Nonprecedential

August 19, 2022

Appeal No.	Origin	Case Name	Status
22-1875	DCT	APOLLO PETROLEUM SOLUTIONS, LLC v. NANO GAS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. [ORDER]	Nonprecedential

August 18, 2022

Appeal No.	Origin	Case Name	Status
21-2342	DCT	PAR PHARMACEUTICAL, INC. v. EAGLE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. [OPINION]	Precedential

August 17, 2022

Appeal No.	Origin	Case Name	Status
22-1016	DCT	CLICK-TO-CALL TECHNOLOGIES, LP v. INGENIO, INC. [OPINION]	Precedential
22-1760	PTO	FG SRC, LLC v. INTEL CORPORATION [ORDER]	Nonprecedential
20-1991	PTO	HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC. v. VIDAL [ORDER]	Nonprecedential

August 16, 2022

Appeal No.	Origin	Case Name	Status
22-1783	CFC	ALFORD v. US [ORDER]	Nonprecedential
22-145	RIT	In Re PALO ALTO NETWORKS, INC. [ORDER]	Precedential

August 12, 2022

Appeal No.	Origin	Case Name	Status
21-1923	PTO	KAMSTRUP A/S v. AXIOMA METERING UAB [OPINION]	Precedential
21-1432	CFC	LABONTE v. US [OPINION]	Precedential
21-1885	CAVC	GONZALEZ v. MCDONOUGH [OPINION]	Nonprecedential

August 11, 2022

Appeal No.	Origin	Case Name	Status
21-1459	CAVC	SULLIVAN v. MCDONOUGH [OPINION]	Nonprecedential
21-2057	PTO	LSI CORPORATION v. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA [OPINION]	Precedential
19-2054	DCT	HOLOGIC, INC. v. MINERVA SURGICAL, INC. [OPINION]	Precedential
22-1565	CAVC	KEEL v. MCDONOUGH [OPINION]	Nonprecedential
21-1932	CIT	MEYER CORPORATION, U.S. v. US [OPINION]	Precedential
21-2312	CIT	HYUNDAI ELECTRIC & ENERGY SYSTEMS v. US [OPINION]	Nonprecedential

August 10, 2022

Appeal No.	Origin	Case Name	Status
21-1697	PTO	In Re MCDONALD [OPINION]	Precedential

August 9, 2022

Appeal No.	Origin	Case Name	Status
21-2098	MSPB	COY v. TREASURY [OPINION]	Precedential
21-2163	CFC	HIRSCH v. US [OPINION]	Nonprecedential
22-154	RIT	In Re HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE CO. [ORDER]	Nonprecedential
22-155	RIT	In Re GYROOR US [ORDER]	Nonprecedential

August 8, 2022

Appeal No.	Origin	Case Name	Status
22-1470	CFC	BRUZZONE v. US [ORDER]	Nonprecedential
22-1852	MSPB	CASH v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY [ORDER]	Nonprecedential
21-2208	PTO	PHILANTHROPIST.COM, INC. v. GENERAL CONFERENCE CORP. OF SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTISTS [RULE 36 JUDGMENT]	Nonprecedential
20-1333	PTO	INFINEUM USA L.P. v. CHEVRON ORONITE COMPANY LLC [OPINION]	Nonprecedential
22-1809	CFC	RASHID v. US [ORDER]	Nonprecedential
22-1806	CAVC	GERMANY v. MCDONOUGH [ORDER]	Nonprecedential

August 5, 2022

Appeal No.	Origin	Case Name	Status
21-1883	PTO	PROVISUR TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. WEBER, INC. [RULE 36 JUDGMENT]	Nonprecedential
21-2347	DCT	THALER v. VIDAL [OPINION]	Precedential
22-1881	MSPB	GUARDINO v. MSPB [ORDER]	Nonprecedential
21-2347	DCT	THALER v. VIDAL [OPINION]	Precedential
22-1881	MSPB	GUARDINO v. MSPB [ORDER]	Nonprecedential
22-1698	DCT	THORPE v. SALISBURY TOWNSHIP, PA [ORDER]	Nonprecedential

August 4, 2022

Appeal No.	Origin	Case Name	Status
20-1399	PTO	NEW VISION GAMING & DEVELOPMENT, INC. v. SG GAMING, INC. [ORDER]	Nonprecedential
22-2043	DCT	CADDO SYSTEMS, INC. v. MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY, INC. [ORDER]	Nonprecedential
22-1950	CAVC	HODORE v. MCDONOUGH [ORDER]	Nonprecedential

August 3, 2022

Appeal No.	Origin	Case Name	Status
21-2222	DCT	A. O. SMITH CORPORATION v. BRADFORD WHITE CORPORATION [OPINION]	Nonprecedential
22-1417	CAVC	RANDOLPH v. MCDONOUGH [OPINION]	Nonprecedential
21-1022	CAVC	JOHNSON-ARIZMENDI v. MCDONOUGH [OPINION]	Nonprecedential
22-1797	PTO	BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORP. v. NEVRO CORP. [ORDER]	Nonprecedential
21-2154	MSPB	ALGUARD v. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE [OPINION]	Nonprecedential

August 2, 2022

Appeal No.	Origin	Case Name	Status
21-2352	PTO	SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. v. DYNAMICS INC. [OPINION]	Nonprecedential
22-1733	DCT	ILLUMINA, INC. v. BGI GENOMICS CO., LTD. [ORDER]	Nonprecedential
21-1988	CIT	VICENTIN S.A.I.C. v. US [OPINION]	Precedential

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Business and Intellectual Property Litigation Notes is presented by Richard A. Catalina, Jr. and Timothy D. Lyons, senior partners in the full service law firm of Jardim, Meisner and Susser, P.C. and seasoned litigation attorneys with a combined experience spanning nearly 65 years. Richard is Chair of the Intellectual Property Litigation Team, a registered patent attorney and a Certified Licensing Professional who has litigated more than one hundred intellectual property matters before various courts and tribunals across the U.S. Tim is a New Jersey Certified Civil Trial Attorney and is Co-Chair of the Business and Commercial Litigation practice teams of the firm. Richard and Tim practice primarily out of the firm’s Tinton Falls office.