September 30, 2022
Appeal No. | Origin | Case Name | Status |
22-1937 | PTO | TRILLER, INC. v. BYTEDANCE LTD. [ORDER] | Nonprecedential |
22-153 | RIT | In Re MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS, INC. [ORDER] | Precedential |
22-1316 | DCT | THERMOLIFE INTERNATIONAL LLC v. HUMAN POWER OF N COMPANY [ORDER] | Nonprecedential |
September 29, 2022
Appeal No. | Origin | Case Name | Status |
21-2121 | PTO | MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. v. MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. [OPINION] | Precedential |
22-2267 | PTO | WSOU INVESTMENTS LLC v. UNIFIED PATENTS, LLC [ORDER] | Nonprecedential |
September 28, 2022
Appeal No. | Origin | Case Name | Status |
21-2167 | DCT | COOPERATIVE ENTERTAINMENT, INC. v. KOLLECTIVE TECHNOLOGY, INC. [OPINION] | Precedential |
21-2133 | CFC | MEMMER v. US [OPINION] | Precedential |
September 27, 2022
Appeal No. | Origin | Case Name | Status |
21-1942 | PTO | PROVISUR TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. WEBER, INC. [OPINION] | Precedential |
September 26, 2022
Appeal No. | Origin | Case Name | Status |
22-1602 | DCT | GROUP ONE LTD. v. GTE GMBH [ORDER] | Nonprecedential |
21-2136 | MSPB | JOHNSON v. MSPB [OPINION] | Nonprecedential |
22-1944 | MSPB | MANUEL v. OPM [ORDER] | Nonprecedential |
September 22, 2022
Appeal No. | Origin | Case Name | Status |
22-1561 | MSPB | FARIS v. AIR FORCE [OPINION] | Nonprecedential |
21-2159 | DCT | CAP EXPORT, LLC v. ZINUS, INC. [OPINION] | Nonprecedential |
September 21, 2022
Appeal No. | Origin | Case Name | Status |
22-1041 | PTO | In Re JOY TEA INC. [ORDER] | Nonprecedential |
September 20, 2022
Appeal No. | Origin | Case Name | Status |
20-1321 | DVA | NOVA v. SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS [OPINION] | Precedential |
September 16, 2022
Appeal No. | Origin | Case Name | Status |
22-1611 | PTO | In Re GOOGLE LLC [ORDER] | Nonprecedential |
21-1941 | CFC | ACADIANA MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLC v. US [ORDER] | Nonprecedential |
22-1908 | CFC | FLYING HORSE v. US [ORDER] | Nonprecedential |
September 15, 2022
Appeal No. | Origin | Case Name | Status |
21-2375 | PTO | LITZ v. TECH GURU, LLC [ORDER] | Nonprecedential |
22-1930 | DCT | AHURUONYE v. INTERIOR [ORDER] | Nonprecedential |
September 14, 2022
Appeal No. | Origin | Case Name | Status |
22-159 | RIT | In Re PHILLIPS [ORDER] | Nonprecedential |
22-1781 | DCT | ATIYEH v. VARA [ORDER] | Nonprecedential |
21-1537 | DCT | SAWSTOP HOLDING LLC v. VIDAL [OPINION] | Precedential |
September 13, 2022
Appeal No. | Origin | Case Name | Status |
22-1229 | DCT | GOLDEN v. APPLE INC. [ERRATA] | Nonprecedential |
September 12, 2022
Appeal No. | Origin | Case Name | Status |
22-1081 | DCT | WINET LABS LLC v. MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC [OPINION | Nonprecedential |
September 9, 2022
Appeal No. | Origin | Case Name | Status |
21-2330 | MSPB | LAL v. HHS [RULE 36 JUDGMENT] | Nonprecedential |
22-1310 | PTO | In Re SMITH [OPINION] | Nonprecedential |
22-1154 | CAVC | DAVIS v. MCDONOUGH [OPINION] | Nonprecedential |
September 8, 2022
Appeal No. | Origin | Case Name | Status |
21-1355 | PTO | APPLE INC. v. MPH TECHNOLOGIES OY [OPINION] | Nonprecedential |
22-1145 | DCT | SEOUL VIOSYS CO., LTD. v. P3 INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION [RULE 36 JUDGMENT] | Nonprecedential |
22-1643 | MSPB | COOKE v. MSPB [ORDER] | Nonprecedential |
21-2172 | CIT | CALIFORNIA STEEL INDUSTRIES, INC. v. US [OPINION] | Precedential |
21-2324 | DCT | HYATT v. PTO [OPINION] | Precedential |
22-1229 | DCT | GOLDEN v. APPLE INC. [OPINION] | Nonprecedential |
22-1196 | CFC | GOLDEN v. US [OPINION] | Nonprecedential |
21-1757 | CAVC | SKAAR v. MCDONOUGH [OPINION] | Precedential |
September 7, 2022
Appeal No. | Origin | Case Name | Status |
22-1183 | CAVC | MOFFETT v. MCDONOUGH [OPINION] | Nonprecedential |
22-1441 | MSPB | BRANDT v. MSPB [OPINION] | Nonprecedential |
21-1967 | DCT | ARENDI S.A.R.L. v. LG ELECTRONICS INC. [OPINION] | Precedential |
22-1738 | CAVC | HOOPER v. MCDONOUGH [OPINION] | Nonprecedential |
September 6, 2022
Appeal No. | Origin | Case Name | Status |
21-2176 | CIT | ARP MATERIALS, INC. v. US [OPINION] | Precedential |
September 1, 2022
Appeal No. | Origin | Case Name | Status |
21-1903 | PTO | NIKE, INC. v. ADIDAS AG [OPINION] | Nonprecedential |