Skip to content

Business and Intellectual Property Litigation Notes

Timely and Topical Discussions in Business, Commercial and IP Litigation

Menu
  • Home
  • Resources/Downloads
  • Quick Links
  • Archives
  • CAFC Opinions/Orders
  • About
  • Contact Us
  • MPEP
Menu

CAFC Opinions/Orders

September 30, 2022

Appeal No.OriginCase NameStatus
22-1937PTOTRILLER, INC. v. BYTEDANCE LTD. [ORDER]Nonprecedential
22-153RITIn Re MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS, INC. [ORDER]Precedential
22-1316DCTTHERMOLIFE INTERNATIONAL LLC v. HUMAN POWER OF N COMPANY [ORDER]Nonprecedential

September 29, 2022

Appeal No.OriginCase NameStatus
21-2121PTOMYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. v. MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. [OPINION]Precedential
22-2267PTOWSOU INVESTMENTS LLC v. UNIFIED PATENTS, LLC [ORDER]Nonprecedential

September 28, 2022

Appeal No.OriginCase NameStatus
21-2167DCTCOOPERATIVE ENTERTAINMENT, INC. v. KOLLECTIVE TECHNOLOGY, INC. [OPINION]Precedential
21-2133CFCMEMMER v. US [OPINION]Precedential

September 27, 2022

Appeal No.OriginCase NameStatus
21-1942PTOPROVISUR TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. WEBER, INC. [OPINION]Precedential

September 26, 2022

Appeal No.OriginCase NameStatus
22-1602DCTGROUP ONE LTD. v. GTE GMBH [ORDER]Nonprecedential
21-2136MSPBJOHNSON v. MSPB [OPINION]Nonprecedential
22-1944MSPBMANUEL v. OPM [ORDER]Nonprecedential

September 22, 2022

Appeal No.OriginCase NameStatus
22-1561MSPBFARIS v. AIR FORCE [OPINION]Nonprecedential
21-2159DCTCAP EXPORT, LLC v. ZINUS, INC. [OPINION]Nonprecedential

September 21, 2022

Appeal No.OriginCase NameStatus
22-1041PTOIn Re JOY TEA INC. [ORDER]Nonprecedential

September 20, 2022

Appeal No.OriginCase NameStatus
20-1321DVANOVA v. SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS [OPINION]Precedential

September 16, 2022

Appeal No.OriginCase NameStatus
22-1611PTOIn Re GOOGLE LLC [ORDER]Nonprecedential
21-1941CFCACADIANA MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLC v. US [ORDER]Nonprecedential
22-1908CFCFLYING HORSE v. US [ORDER]Nonprecedential

September 15, 2022

Appeal No.OriginCase NameStatus
21-2375PTOLITZ v. TECH GURU, LLC [ORDER]Nonprecedential
22-1930DCTAHURUONYE v. INTERIOR [ORDER]Nonprecedential

September 14, 2022

Appeal No.OriginCase NameStatus
22-159RITIn Re PHILLIPS [ORDER]Nonprecedential
22-1781DCTATIYEH v. VARA [ORDER]Nonprecedential
21-1537DCTSAWSTOP HOLDING LLC v. VIDAL [OPINION]Precedential

September 13, 2022

Appeal No.OriginCase NameStatus
22-1229DCTGOLDEN v. APPLE INC. [ERRATA]Nonprecedential

September 12, 2022

Appeal No.OriginCase NameStatus
22-1081DCTWINET LABS LLC v. MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC [OPINIONNonprecedential

September 9, 2022

Appeal No.OriginCase NameStatus
21-2330MSPBLAL v. HHS [RULE 36 JUDGMENT]Nonprecedential
22-1310PTOIn Re SMITH [OPINION]Nonprecedential
22-1154CAVCDAVIS v. MCDONOUGH [OPINION]Nonprecedential

September 8, 2022

Appeal No.OriginCase NameStatus
21-1355PTOAPPLE INC. v. MPH TECHNOLOGIES OY [OPINION]Nonprecedential
22-1145DCTSEOUL VIOSYS CO., LTD. v. P3 INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION [RULE 36 JUDGMENT]Nonprecedential
22-1643MSPBCOOKE v. MSPB [ORDER]Nonprecedential
21-2172CITCALIFORNIA STEEL INDUSTRIES, INC. v. US [OPINION]Precedential
21-2324DCTHYATT v. PTO [OPINION]Precedential
22-1229DCTGOLDEN v. APPLE INC. [OPINION]Nonprecedential
22-1196CFCGOLDEN v. US [OPINION]Nonprecedential
21-1757CAVCSKAAR v. MCDONOUGH [OPINION]Precedential

September 7, 2022

Appeal No.OriginCase NameStatus
22-1183CAVCMOFFETT v. MCDONOUGH [OPINION]Nonprecedential
22-1441MSPBBRANDT v. MSPB [OPINION]Nonprecedential
21-1967DCTARENDI S.A.R.L. v. LG ELECTRONICS INC. [OPINION]Precedential
22-1738CAVCHOOPER v. MCDONOUGH [OPINION]Nonprecedential

September 6, 2022

Appeal No.OriginCase NameStatus
21-2176CITARP MATERIALS, INC. v. US [OPINION]Precedential

September 1, 2022

Appeal No.OriginCase NameStatus
21-1903PTONIKE, INC. v. ADIDAS AG [OPINION]Nonprecedential

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

About This Site

Business and Intellectual Property Litigation Notes is presented by Richard A. Catalina, Jr. and Timothy D. Lyons, senior partners in the full service law firm of Jardim, Meisner and Susser, P.C. and seasoned litigation attorneys with a combined experience spanning nearly 65 years.  Richard is Chair of the Intellectual Property Litigation Team, a registered patent attorney and a Certified Licensing Professional who has litigated more than one hundred intellectual property matters before various courts and tribunals across the U.S.  Tim is a New Jersey Certified Civil Trial Attorney and is Co-Chair of the Business and Commercial Litigation practice teams of the firm.  Richard and Tim practice primarily out of the firm’s Tinton Falls office.

AI amc networks artificial intelligence attorneys fees better call saul breaking bad business divorce business litigation CAFC chief justice john roberts defamation design patent design trademarks disparagement federal circuit injunctions injurious falsehood inter partes review invalidity ipr judge alan albright laches lanham act liberty tax services litigation NJ Supreme Court on-sale bar patent patent infringement patent litigation permanent injunction ptab SCOTUS Section 102 sony pictures televisiion statutory damages trade dress trademark infringement trademark litigation trademark registration treble damages U.S. Supreme Court uspto venue WDTX

March 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  
« Feb    

Find Us

Address
Jardim, Meisner & Susser, P.C.
766 Shrewsbury Avenue
Suite 202
Tinton Falls, NJ 07724
Tel: 732.978.1920
Fax: 732.852.2973

    ©2026 Business and Intellectual Property Litigation Notes | Design: Newspaperly WordPress Theme