Skip to content

Business and Intellectual Property Litigation Notes

Timely and Topical Discussions in Business, Commercial and IP Litigation

Menu
  • Home
  • Resources/Downloads
  • Quick Links
  • Archives
  • CAFC Opinions/Orders
  • About
  • Contact Us
  • MPEP
Menu

Author: rcatalina

Jury Finds ‘MetaBirkins’ NFT Maker Liable for Trademark Infringement

Posted on February 21, 2023February 21, 2023 by rcatalina

On February 8, 2023, a Manhattan federal jury in the SDNY held Los Angeles designer Mason Rothschild liable for trademark infringement to high-end Paris fashion house Hermes International (“Hermes”) for his “MetaBirkins”…

USPTO Director Imposes Sanctions Against Petitioner and Counsel for Abuse of IPR Process

Posted on October 10, 2022February 21, 2023 by rcatalina

In a director review decision issued on October 4, 2022, USPTO Director Kathi Vidal imposed crushing sanctions against IPR petitioner OpenSky Industries and its legal counsel for extensive discovery violations and extortion…

Analysis: ‘Reasonable Expectations’ Control in Minority Shareholder Oppression Cases

Posted on September 25, 2022September 26, 2022 by rcatalina

In a recent decision, New Jersey’s Appellate Division addressed the standard of proof for minority shareholder oppression under New Jersey law, reaffirming the “reasonable expectations” standard.  In Matusow v. Iznec, et al.,…

PTAB Upholds Validity of AI Patent

Posted on September 21, 2022September 25, 2022 by rcatalina

A split panel of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board recently upheld an AI (artificial intelligence) patent after it was previously ruled invalid nine months earlier by U.S. District Judge Alan Albright…

The Great Moderna Covid Vaccine Patent Suit

Posted on September 12, 2022September 16, 2022 by rcatalina

Covid-19 vaccine maker Moderna filed a lawsuit on August 26, 2022 against Pfizer Inc. and BioNTech, alleging that its rivals “followed the trail Moderna blazed” years ago in developing the technology behind…

NJ Supreme Court: No Discounts in Determining Fair Value of Business Undergoing Divorce

Posted on September 7, 2022September 7, 2022 by rcatalina

In litigation matters or disputes regarding business valuation of a corporate entity, the goal of establishing fair value by a court includes the discretion as to whether any “discounts” should be applied. …

Appeals Filed with Supreme Court Seeking Review of ‘Written Description’ Rulings

Posted on August 25, 2022September 16, 2022 by rcatalina

Currently pending before the U.S. Supreme Court are three petitions for certiorari dealing with the “written description” requirement in the Patent Act, 35 U.S.C. §112.  While each petition presents a distinct question…

NJ Supreme Court Abolishes “New Business Rule”

Posted on August 19, 2022September 16, 2022 by rcatalina

Since 1936, New Jersey has followed the “new business rule,” which bars claims for lost profits by new businesses on the ground that no such claim can be proven with reasonable certainty. …

Posts pagination

1 2 Next

About This Site

Business and Intellectual Property Litigation Notes is presented by Richard A. Catalina, Jr. and Timothy D. Lyons, senior partners in the full service law firm of Jardim, Meisner and Susser, P.C. and seasoned litigation attorneys with a combined experience spanning nearly 65 years.  Richard is Chair of the Intellectual Property Litigation Team, a registered patent attorney and a Certified Licensing Professional who has litigated more than one hundred intellectual property matters before various courts and tribunals across the U.S.  Tim is a New Jersey Certified Civil Trial Attorney and is Co-Chair of the Business and Commercial Litigation practice teams of the firm.  Richard and Tim practice primarily out of the firm’s Tinton Falls office.

AI amc networks artificial intelligence attorneys fees better call saul breaking bad business divorce business litigation CAFC chief justice john roberts defamation design patent design trademarks disparagement federal circuit injunctions injurious falsehood inter partes review invalidity ipr judge alan albright laches lanham act liberty tax services litigation NJ Supreme Court on-sale bar patent patent infringement patent litigation permanent injunction ptab SCOTUS Section 102 sony pictures televisiion statutory damages trade dress trademark infringement trademark litigation trademark registration treble damages U.S. Supreme Court uspto venue WDTX

March 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  
« Feb    

Find Us

Address
Jardim, Meisner & Susser, P.C.
766 Shrewsbury Avenue
Suite 202
Tinton Falls, NJ 07724
Tel: 732.978.1920
Fax: 732.852.2973

    ©2026 Business and Intellectual Property Litigation Notes | Design: Newspaperly WordPress Theme