Skip to content

Business and Intellectual Property Litigation Notes

Timely and Topical Discussions in Business, Commercial and IP Litigation

Menu
  • Home
  • Resources/Downloads
  • Quick Links
  • Archives
  • CAFC Opinions/Orders
  • About
  • Contact Us
  • MPEP
Menu

CAFC Opinions/Orders

The U.S. Federal Circuit Court of Appeals publishes online all opinions, precedential orders, dispositive orders in writs petitions, Rule 36 judgments, non-ministerial orders relating to rehearing or en banc petitions or actions, dispositive orders constituting either judgment or mandate, and any errata notice or revised version for any of the preceding document types. Business and Intellectual Property Litigation Notes provides the following direct access to CAFC opinions and orders.

_________________________________

February 2023

February 21, 2023

Appeal No.OriginCase NameStatus
22-2093CFCPINTO v. US [OPINION]Nonprecedential
22-1918CAVCSORRELL v. MCDONOUGH [OPINION]Nonprecedential

February 17, 2023

Appeal No.OriginCase NameStatus
23-1146DCTLITE-NETICS, LLC v. NU TSAI CAPITAL LLC [OPINION]Precedential
22-1377CFCINDIANA MUNICIPAL POWER AGENCY v. US [OPINION]Precedential
22-1136DCTC.R. BARD, INC. v. MEDICAL COMPONENTS, INC. [OPINION]Nonprecedential
22-1222DCTHAWK TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS, LLC v. CASTLE RETAIL, LLC [OPINION]Precedential
22-1059DCTNEUROPTICS, INC. v. BRIGHTLAMP, INC. [OPINION]Nonprecedential

February 16, 2023

Appeal No.OriginCase NameStatus
22-2264MSPBCASILLAS v. DVA [ORDER]Nonprecedential
21-1900DCTVR OPTICS, LLC v. PELOTON INTERACTIVE, INC. [OPINION]Nonprecedential

February 15, 2023

Appeal No.OriginCase NameStatus
23-1329MSPBKENT v. SSA [ORDER]Nonprecedential
23-1319MSPBKENT v. SSA [ORDER]Nonprecedential
22-2087CAVCKEYS v. MCDONOUGH [OPINION]Nonprecedential
22-1127PTOKEYNETIK, INC. v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. [OPINION]Nonprecedential
23-1310CFCARMSTEAD v. US [ORDER]Nonprecedential
23-1381PTOSOLER v. COCA-COLA COMPANY [ORDER]Nonprecedential
21-2368CAVCDONAGHUE v. MCDONOUGH [OPINION]Nonprecedential
21-2246DCTMINERVA SURGICAL, INC. v. HOLOGIC, INC. [OPINION]Precedential

February 14, 2023

Appeal No.OriginCase NameStatus
19-2057PTOVILOX TECHNOLOGIES, LLC v. UNIFIED PATENTS, LLC [RULE 36 JUDGMENT]Nonprecedential
21-2334CAVCPEIRITSCH v. MCDONOUGH [RULE 36 JUDGMENT]Nonprecedential
22-2254MSPBHARROW v. DEFENSE [ORDER]Nonprecedential
22-1247CAVCDAVIS v. MCDONOUGH [OPINION]Nonprecedential
23-1060DCTCABEZAS v. FLINT GROUP, LLC [ORDER]Nonprecedential
21-1662CFCADAMS v. US [OPINION]Precedential
22-1856PTOXILINX, INC. v. VIDAL [ORDER]Nonprecedential

February 13, 2023

Appeal No.OriginCase NameStatus
22-1116DCTCHROMADEX, INC. v. ELYSIUM HEALTH, INC. [OPINION]Precedential
22-1146PTOSOFTBELLYS, INC. v. TY INC. [OPINION]Nonprecedential
23-1228CFCTOLLIVER GROUP, INC. v. US [ORDER]Nonprecedential
21-2345DCTSSI TECHNOLOGIES, LLC v. DONGGUAN ZHENGYANG ELECTRONIC MECHANICAL LTD. [OPINION]Precedential
22-1277CFCBEHRENS v. US [OPINION]Precedential

February 10, 2023

Appeal No.OriginCase NameStatus
21-2258CAVCMIRANDA v. MCDONOUGH [RULE 36 JUDGMENT]Nonprecedential
22-1160PTOIDEAHUB INC. v. UNIFIED PATENTS, LLC [OPINION]Nonprecedential
22-1371CFCLOYD v. HHS [OPINION]Nonprecedential
22-1376CFCALEARIS, INC. v. US [RULE 36 JUDGMENT]Nonprecedential
23-1099MSPBLILLY v. MSPB [ORDER]Nonprecedential
22-1810CFCMARTIN v. US [OPINION]Nonprecedential

February 9, 2023

Appeal No.OriginCase NameStatus
21-2288CAVCCOX v. MCDONOUGH [RULE 36 JUDGMENT]Nonprecedential
22-1487MSPBFERRELL v. HUD [OPINION]Nonprecedential
21-1103PTOGUARDANT HEALTH, INC. v. VIDAL [RULE 36 JUDGMENT]Nonprecedential
23-1103PTOIn Re BRUNETTI [ORDER]Nonprecedential
22-2297CFCOGBURN v. US [OPINION]Nonprecedential

February 8, 2023

Appeal No.OriginCase NameStatus
21-2326CFCFISHERMEN’S FINEST, INC. v. US [OPINION]Precedential
22-1317DCTVAN DYKE v. WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES [RULE 36 JUDGMENT]Nonprecedential
20-1565PTOCYWEE GROUP LTD. v. GOOGLE LLC [OPINION]Precedential
22-1847PTOSAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. v. NANOCO TECHNOLOGIES LTD. [ORDER]Nonprecedential
22-1848PTOSAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. v. NANOCO TECHNOLOGIES LTD. [ORDER]Nonprecedential

February 7, 2023

Appeal No.OriginCase NameStatus
22-2187CAVCVAZQUEZ TORRES v. MCDONOUGH [OPINION]Nonprecedential
22-2253DCTVIFOR FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE RENAL PHARMA LTD. v. LUPIN ATLANTIS HOLDINGS SA [ORDER]Nonprecedential
21-2066CITPRIMESOURCE BUILDING PRODUCTS, INC. v. US [OPINION]Precedential
23-1082DCTCFL TECHNOLOGIES LLC v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY [ORDER]Nonprecedential

February 6, 2023

Appeal No.OriginCase NameStatus
22-1161CITACQUISITION 362, LLC v. US [OPINION]Precedential
23-1235DCTBIAL – PORTELA & CA. SA v. ALKEM LABORATORIES LTD. [ORDER]Nonprecedential

February 3, 2023

Appeal No.OriginCase NameStatus
20-1140PTOTRANSTEX INC. v. VIDAL [OPINION]Nonprecedential

February 2, 2023

Appeal No.OriginCase NameStatus
21-2322PTOIn Re WINGEN LLC [OPINION]Nonprecedential
22-1288OCBDLEGGETT v. OCWR [OPINION]Nonprecedential
23-1283OSHCSHULTZ v. OSHRC [ORDER]Nonprecedential

February 1, 2023

Appeal No.OriginCase NameStatus
23-1044CAVCVAN DERMARK v. MCDONOUGH [ORDER]Nonprecedential
23-101RITIn Re GOOGLE LLC [ORDER]Precedential
23-1098MSPBSLAMA v. HHS [ORDER]Nonprecedential

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

About This Site

Business and Intellectual Property Litigation Notes is presented by Richard A. Catalina, Jr. and Timothy D. Lyons, senior partners in the full service law firm of Jardim, Meisner and Susser, P.C. and seasoned litigation attorneys with a combined experience spanning nearly 65 years.  Richard is Chair of the Intellectual Property Litigation Team, a registered patent attorney and a Certified Licensing Professional who has litigated more than one hundred intellectual property matters before various courts and tribunals across the U.S.  Tim is a New Jersey Certified Civil Trial Attorney and is Co-Chair of the Business and Commercial Litigation practice teams of the firm.  Richard and Tim practice primarily out of the firm’s Tinton Falls office.

AI amc networks artificial intelligence attorneys fees better call saul breaking bad business divorce business litigation CAFC chief justice john roberts defamation design patent design trademarks disparagement federal circuit injunctions injurious falsehood inter partes review invalidity ipr judge alan albright laches lanham act liberty tax services litigation NJ Supreme Court on-sale bar patent patent infringement patent litigation permanent injunction ptab SCOTUS Section 102 sony pictures televisiion statutory damages trade dress trademark infringement trademark litigation trademark registration treble damages U.S. Supreme Court uspto venue WDTX

March 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  
« Feb    

Find Us

Address
Jardim, Meisner & Susser, P.C.
766 Shrewsbury Avenue
Suite 202
Tinton Falls, NJ 07724
Tel: 732.978.1920
Fax: 732.852.2973

    ©2026 Business and Intellectual Property Litigation Notes | Design: Newspaperly WordPress Theme