Skip to content

Business and Intellectual Property Litigation Notes

Timely and Topical Discussions in Business, Commercial and IP Litigation

Menu
  • Home
  • Resources/Downloads
  • Quick Links
  • Archives
  • CAFC Opinions/Orders
  • About
  • Contact Us
  • MPEP
Menu
Trademark, NFTs, transformative art, Hermes et al. v. Rothschild, 1:22-cv-00384, SDNY, Richard Catalina, patent litigation, trademark litigation, infringement, attorney, lawyer, intellectual property, Lanham Act, federal court, Patent Trial and Appeal Board, PTAB, IPR

Jury Finds ‘MetaBirkins’ NFT Maker Liable for Trademark Infringement

Posted on February 21, 2023February 21, 2023 by rcatalina

On February 8, 2023, a Manhattan federal jury in the SDNY held Los Angeles designer Mason Rothschild liable for trademark infringement to high-end Paris fashion house Hermes International (“Hermes”) for his “MetaBirkins” non-fungible tokens or NFTs.  The subject NFTs depicted Hermes’s pricey Birkin handbags.  The suit has been closely watched by both artists and fashion designers, as owners of their respective intellectual property.

In 2022, Hermes sued Rothschild, 28, whose real name is Sonny Estival, claiming his NFTs infringe its marks protecting its Birkin handbags both in name and appearance.  Hermes sells the wildly popular bags for as much as $200,000 and its representatives told the jury that Rothschild has hurt its ability to market the products in emerging online spaces.

Rothschild, who sold 100 of the NFTs in late 2021 for $450 each, claimed that his art constituted free speech and was fair use of Hermes’ intellectual property.  Specifically, Rothschild asserted that as a self-styled pop artist like Andy Warhol, he has a constitutional right to produce and market purported “transformative art” even if it emulates trademarked products.

Both sides filed for summary judgment, but U.S. District Judge Jed S. Rakoff denied the motions as a result of disputed facts as to whether Rothschild created the NFTs as an artist or as an attempt to possibly shakedown Hermes for commercial gain.

The jury said Rothschild found $110,000 in damages based on the profit and resale commissions he received from selling the infringing NFTs.  The jury also found that Rothschild pay $23,000 in damages for cybersquatting.

An appeal by Rothschild to the Second Circuit is expected. The case is Hermes et al. v. Rothschild, case number 1:22-cv-00384, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.

facebookShare on Facebook
TwitterTweet
FollowFollow us
PinterestSave

About This Site

Business and Intellectual Property Litigation Notes is presented by Richard A. Catalina, Jr. and Timothy D. Lyons, senior partners in the full service law firm of Jardim, Meisner and Susser, P.C. and seasoned litigation attorneys with a combined experience spanning nearly 65 years.  Richard is Chair of the Intellectual Property Litigation Team, a registered patent attorney and a Certified Licensing Professional who has litigated more than one hundred intellectual property matters before various courts and tribunals across the U.S.  Tim is a New Jersey Certified Civil Trial Attorney and is Co-Chair of the Business and Commercial Litigation practice teams of the firm.  Richard and Tim practice primarily out of the firm’s Tinton Falls office.

AI amc networks artificial intelligence attorneys fees better call saul breaking bad business divorce business litigation CAFC chief justice john roberts defamation design patent design trademarks disparagement federal circuit injunctions injurious falsehood inter partes review invalidity ipr judge alan albright laches lanham act liberty tax services litigation NJ Supreme Court on-sale bar patent patent infringement patent litigation permanent injunction ptab SCOTUS Section 102 sony pictures televisiion statutory damages trade dress trademark infringement trademark litigation trademark registration treble damages U.S. Supreme Court uspto venue WDTX

March 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  
« Feb    

Find Us

Address
Jardim, Meisner & Susser, P.C.
766 Shrewsbury Avenue
Suite 202
Tinton Falls, NJ 07724
Tel: 732.978.1920
Fax: 732.852.2973

    ©2026 Business and Intellectual Property Litigation Notes | Design: Newspaperly WordPress Theme