Skip to content

Business and Intellectual Property Litigation Notes

Timely and Topical Discussions in Business, Commercial and IP Litigation

Menu
  • Home
  • Resources/Downloads
  • Quick Links
  • Archives
  • CAFC Opinions/Orders
  • About
  • Contact Us
  • MPEP
Menu

CAFC Panel Rules that AI Created “Inventions” Are Not Patentable

Posted on August 16, 2022September 16, 2022 by rcatalina

Are inventions created by artificial intelligence or AI patentable?  That was the question addressed by the Federal Circuit in the matter of Thaler v. Vidal, No. 21-2347 (CAFC August 5, 2022).  The…

CAFC Considers Whether PTAB May Raise Invalidity Arguments

Posted on August 4, 2022September 16, 2022 by rcatalina

The Federal Circuit is reviewing whether the PTAB may, sua sponte, raise the issue of validity of a patent where the patent owner files a motion to amend the claims and the petitioner actively and formally opposes the motion.

Liberty Tax Services Alleges Infringement, Disparagement In ‘Better Call Saul’

Posted on August 3, 2022September 16, 2022 by rcatalina

Liberty Tax Service filed a complaint in the SDNY on August 1, 2022 accusing AMC Networks and Sony Pictures Television of trademark infringement and defamation, alleging they disparaged the chain in the…

Gibson Awarded Permanent Injunction on its “Flying V” Guitar Design Trademark

Posted on August 2, 2022September 16, 2022 by rcatalina

The Gibson Flying V is an iconic electric guitar first introduced by Gibson Guitar Corp. (now Gibson Brands, Inc.) in 1958 and used by many prominent players, including, on occasion, the legendary…

Supreme Court Asked to Review On-Sale Bar Ruling by Federal Circuit

Posted on August 1, 2022September 16, 2022 by rcatalina

Does a price quote constitute an offer of sale, thereby invoking the on-sale bar of Section 102 of the patent statute?  That is the question presented in a petition filed with the…

Judge Albright’s Patent Litigation Monopoly in WDTX Comes to an End

Posted on July 28, 2022September 21, 2022 by rcatalina

Judge Alan Albright ordered to equitably distribute patent infringement litigation to twelve judges in Western District of Texas.

Posts pagination

Previous 1 2

About This Site

Business and Intellectual Property Litigation Notes is presented by Richard A. Catalina, Jr. and Timothy D. Lyons, senior partners in the full service law firm of Jardim, Meisner and Susser, P.C. and seasoned litigation attorneys with a combined experience spanning nearly 65 years.  Richard is Chair of the Intellectual Property Litigation Team, a registered patent attorney and a Certified Licensing Professional who has litigated more than one hundred intellectual property matters before various courts and tribunals across the U.S.  Tim is a New Jersey Certified Civil Trial Attorney and is Co-Chair of the Business and Commercial Litigation practice teams of the firm.  Richard and Tim practice primarily out of the firm’s Tinton Falls office.

AI amc networks artificial intelligence attorneys fees better call saul breaking bad business divorce business litigation CAFC chief justice john roberts defamation design patent design trademarks disparagement federal circuit injunctions injurious falsehood inter partes review invalidity ipr judge alan albright laches lanham act liberty tax services litigation NJ Supreme Court on-sale bar patent patent infringement patent litigation permanent injunction ptab SCOTUS Section 102 sony pictures televisiion statutory damages trade dress trademark infringement trademark litigation trademark registration treble damages U.S. Supreme Court uspto venue WDTX

March 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  
« Feb    

Find Us

Address
Jardim, Meisner & Susser, P.C.
766 Shrewsbury Avenue
Suite 202
Tinton Falls, NJ 07724
Tel: 732.978.1920
Fax: 732.852.2973

    ©2026 Business and Intellectual Property Litigation Notes | Design: Newspaperly WordPress Theme